Legal Opinion

Pablo v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1917No. 2873PublishedCited by 4 opinions

In Error to the District Court of the United S'tates for the District of Montana; Geo. M. Bourquin, Judge. Joseph Pablo was convicted of introducing liquor into an Indian reservation, and he appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

HUNT, Circuit Judge.

Joseph Pablo, plaintiff in error, was indicted in three counts for having at different times introduced liquor into the Flathead Indian reservation in Montana. He was tried and acquitted under two counts, but convicted under the third; and by writ of error ask's review in this court.

The first point made is that the court erred in allowing a witness to testify over the objection of'defendant’s counsel, who stated that Hunter was incompetent to testify, having been convicted and sentenced for a felony, which was not specified in the objection. It does not appear that any…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Willie Benny YatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  2. Sneed, Lockridge v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1955
  3. State v. LizotteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1967
  4. Korol v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API