Legal Opinion

Korol v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided June 28, 1951No. 1066Published

1Opinion of the Court

CLAGETT, Associate Judge.

Defendant, doing business as the Korol Egg Company, was charged with having violated certain provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act 1 in that he introduced and caused to be delivered in interstate commerce misbranded cans containing adulterated eggs. A jury returned a verdict of guilty on two of the four counts of the information, and defendant was duly sentenced. He appeals.

The eggs had been broken and sold in liquid form to a local bakery. The two counts on which defendant was convicted charged that the food thus shipped was both adulterated and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Morton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  2. McAffee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1939
  3. A. O. Andersen & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922
  4. District Hauling & Construction Co. v. ArgerakisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1943
  5. Mattson v. Minnesota & North Wisconsin RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API