Legal Opinion

Bultron v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided March 30, 2006No. 62, 2005PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIDGELY, Justice.

Defendant Luis Buitrón appeals his convictions by a Superior Court jury of second-degree burglary and misdemeanor theft. Buitrón argues that the Superior Court erred by permitting his counsel to withdraw, by failing to appoint new counsel, and by requiring Buitrón to proceed pro se. The Superior Court determined that Buitrón waived or forfeited his right to counsel by his serious misconduct involving ongoing abuse of his attorney that was just short of violence. Whether a defendant waives or forfeits his right to counsel through ongoing abusive conduct is an issue of first…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Illinois v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Wheat v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Ungar v. SarafiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
  2. Commonwealth v. LucarelliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Jackson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Cooke v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2014
  5. State v. LehmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API