Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. E. Bement's Sons

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1910No. Docket No. 57PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Assumpsit by Abraham Jacobs against E. Bement’s Sons on certain promissory notes. A judgment for defendant is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error. Plaintiff brought assumpsit against defendant to recover on four notes, amounting, with interest, to $2,666.58, executed by defendant and indorsed to plaintiff. Defendant was a Michigan corporation, and, in defense, alleged dissolution proceedings under 3 Comp.

Read the full summary

Error to Ingham; Wiest, J. Assumpsit by Abraham Jacobs against E. Bement’s Sons on certain promissory notes. A judgment for defendant is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error. Plaintiff brought assumpsit against defendant to recover on four notes, amounting, with interest, to $2,666.58, executed by defendant and indorsed to plaintiff. Defendant was a Michigan corporation, and, in defense, alleged dissolution proceedings under 3 Comp. Laws, chap. 300, and a decree therein May 6, 1905, dissolving the corporation and appointing a permanent receiver. The notes were presented during the course of…

1Opinion of the CourtBlair, J.

I am of the opinion that the circuit judge reached a correct conclusion in this case. The maintenance of the plaintiff’s suit depends upon whether or not the provisions of section 8534, 3 Comp. Laws, apply to proceedings for the voluntary dissolution of a corporation under chapter 300 thereof. I think that section does not apply. It is a familiar rule of construction that—

“When, after an enumeration, the statute employs some general term to embrace other cases, the other- cases must be understood to be cases of the same general character, sort, or kind with those named.” Brooks v. Cook, 44…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Attorney-General v. Guardian Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. Brooks v. CookMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Roberts v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
  4. American Steel & Wire Co. v. EddyMichigan Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Cady v. Centreville Knit Goods Mfg. Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1882

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Kopio's, Inc. v. Bridgeman Creameries, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  2. Detroit Trust Co. v. GoodrichMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Johnson v. RichardsIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  4. Vassar Foundry Co. v. Whiting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  5. T. W. Warner Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1930

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API