Legal Opinion
Erlich v. Landman
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtCribb, J.
This is an action brought by plaintiff to recover the rental of business premises in the city of Hornell for the month of May, 1942. Liability of the defendant tenant depends upon the interpretation to be given to an amendment to the lease.
In 1936 the plaintiff, Gertrude Q. Erlich, and the defendant, Max I. Landman, had executed a written lease whereby the defendant leased from the plaintiff a valuable store for a period of five years at a monthly rental of $300. It appears that the defendant established a clothing business in this store with or for his son, Maxwell Landman, then a. minor,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- M. O'Neil Supply Co. v. Petroleum Heat & Power Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1939
- White v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Colonial Operating Corp. v. Hannan Sales & Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942
- Schantz v. American Auto Supply Co.New York Supreme Court · 1942
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cunard Line Ltd. v. AbneyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982