Legal Opinion

Hyman v. Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtLouis G. Bruhn, J.

This is a motion on behalf of the defendant, Yale Transport Corp., whom I shall refer to as Yale, for an order pursuant to rule 106 of the Buies of Civil Practice, dismissing the first cross complaint and the second cross complaint of the defendant, Cohoes Industrial Terminal, Inc., whom I shall refer to as Cohoes, on the grounds that it appears from the face thereof that neither complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action and that neither states *1035facts sufficient to constitute a claim pursuant to section 264 of the Civil Practice Act.

Such section provides in part: “…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McFall v. Compagnie Maritime Belge (Lloyd Royal) S. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Wagman v. American Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
  3. Ruping v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  4. Schellhorn v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
  5. Aulisio v. California Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API