Behringer v. South Plains Coaches, Inc.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtNickels, J.
Judgment for Behringer, allowing recovery for personal injuries suffered in and as a result of a collision of one of the coaches of defendant in error with an automobile driven by a stranger, was reversed, and the cause was remanded, by the Court of Civil Appeals. 4 S.W.(2d) 1003. Writ of error was allowed upon assignments presenting matters to be discussed.
1. Since, according to his averments, Behringer’s “head was badly cut, and bruised,” and since “fracture” conceivably may be evidence, result, or other self of “cut” or “bruise,” we are inclined to believe the allegation was sufficient to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Beave v. St. Louis Transit Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1908
- Davis v. HillTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Emberlin v. Wichita Falls, R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. HarlingTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Wichita Falls. R. & Ft. W. Ry. Co. v. EmberlinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1925
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- West Texas Utilities Co. v. RennerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
- Texas Indemnity Ins. Co. v. McCurryTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
- Williams v. RodockerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1930
- Floyd v. Fidelity Union Casualty Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1931
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.