Legal Opinion

Connery v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 21, 1972No. A-16607PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND OPINION

BRETT, Judge:

William Higgins Connery was tried by a for the offense of obtaining money by a jury in the District Court of Texas County false pretense. He was found guilty, sentenced to serve three (3) years in the state penitentiary, and from that conviction, this appeal has been perfected. Appellant Connery will hereafter be referred to as defendant, as he appeared in the trial court. We affirm.

The information alleged that the defendant obtained money by false pretenses by claiming to be the long absent nephew of Mr. and Mrs. Price Brown. The prosecution proved that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Richard E. Loux and Neil Conrad Wallen v. United States of America, Vertis James Barrett, Arthur St. Peter Andharold Oscar Thomas v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  2. Sandefur v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1969
  3. State v. WaidUtah Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Cockerham v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1947

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. CurtisSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. People v. MerrittMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  3. People v. TravisMichigan Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API