Legal Opinion

Miller v. State

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided August 12, 1981No. Civ. 2558PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a paternity suit.

The State of Alabama, upon the petition of Patricia Crutcher, brought a paternity suit against Michael Miller. The trial court, after an ore tenus hearing, found Miller to be the child's father and ordered him to pay child support.

Miller, the reputed father, appeals, contending through able counsel (1) that the suit was time barred under § 26-12-7, Code of Ala. 1975, and that the trial court erred by denying Miller's motion to dismiss, and (2) that the trial court erred by requiring Miller to testify.

We find no error and affirm.

The record reveals the following facts:

Th…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Everage v. GibsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. State v. HortonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  3. Keener v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Ward v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1964
  5. Reynolds v. RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BurksCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  2. Howells v. MaconCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  3. Kennebrew v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1985
  4. Williams v. CottrellCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API