Legal Opinion
Specht v. Eastwood-Nealley Corp.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided March 10, 1953PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
25 N.J. Super. 69 (1953)
95 A.2d 485
HARRY G. SPECHT, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
EASTWOOD-NEALLEY CORPORATION, THE NATIONAL STATE BANK OF NEWARK, AS TRUSTEE, ETC., AND CALVIN H. NEALLEY, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued February 16, 1953.
Decided March 10, 1953.
Before Judges EASTWOOD, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. Vincent P. Biunno argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Lum, Fairlie & Foster, attorneys).
Mr. Ernest F. Keer, Jr., argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Boyd, Dodd, Keer & Booth, attorneys).
The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Frank v. Frank's Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Safford v. BarberNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Hildinger v. BishopNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
- Bronsdon v. ShupeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
3Cited by5 opinions
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- W & H MacHine & Tool Co. v. National Distillers & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1973
- Specht v. Eastwood-Nealley Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- CHEN v. WANGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2024
- SUNTUITY SOLAR, LLC v. ROSEBURGDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023