Legal Opinion
United States v. Michael Antonio Ross
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided March 1, 1976No. 75--1620PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Per curiam
Having previously been convicted of a felony, Michael Antonio Ross was found guilty and sentenced in the District Court for subsequently possessing a .38 caliber Colt semi-automatic pistol and a .38 caliber revolver in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1202(a)(1) App. and 2. 1 He appeals against the Court’s refusal to suppress the use of the firearms in evidence against him at trial, contending that they were seized illegally. We find the contention untenable.
In the early afternoon of January 18, 1974, United States Treasury Agents and County Police, carrying a Federal warrant for the search of Ross’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Alan Martin PomsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Antonio R. SedilloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. David BacaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
3Cited by6 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BondMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- State v. WondersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- State v. GallowaySupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- In Re Property Seized From BeckerDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1981
- Bynum v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.