Maier v. Romano

The plaintiff seeks in this action to recover a real-estate broker’s commission; the court rendered its judgment for the defendant, and on his appeal the plaintiff assigns as error the court’s conclusion, that plaintiff and defendant made no agreement respecting the sale of the property under which the plaintiff found a purchaser, as one which could not be reasonably or logically drawn from the facts found. An examination of the material facts found makes it entirely clear that this assignment of error is bad. The defendant’s husband requested the plaintiff to find a customer for defendant’s…