Legal Opinion

United States v. Daniel Saquil-Orozco

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 5, 2013No. 12-3848Unpublished

1Per curiam

Daniel Saquil-Orozco pleaded guilty to firearm and immigration offenses under a written plea agreement, and the District Court 1 imposed concurrent sentences of 100 months in prison followed by one year of supervised release. On appeal, Saquil-Orozco’s counsel has moved to withdraw and has filed a brief under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), arguing that the District Court abused its discretion in denying Saquil-Orozco’s pro se motion for a new attorney. In a supplemental brief, Saquil- Orozco argues that (1) counsel was ineffective, (2) the court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. United States v. Charles Lester MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  4. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF—APPELLEE v. FRITZ ARLO LOOKING CLOUD, DEFENDANT—APPELLANTCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
  5. United States v. KlingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API