Archer-Daniels-Midland Co. v. Paillardon
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MICHAEL P. McCUSKEY, District Judge.
This case is before the court for ruling on the Petition to Vacate Arbitration *638Award (# 1) filed by Plaintiffs, Archer-Daniels-Midland Company and ADM Latin America, Inc.1, and related Motions. This court has carefully reviewed the arguments of the parties and the lengthy exhibits provided by the parties. Following this careful and thorough review, this court rules as follows: (1) Plaintiffs’ Motion to File Oversize Reply Brief (# 18) is GRANTED; (2) Plaintiffs’ Motion for Hearing (# 19) is DENIED; (3) the Motion to Cite Newly-Issued Authority (# 22)…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Eastern Associated Coal Corp. v. United Mine Workers, District 17Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Ethyl Corporation v. United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-Clc and Local No. 7441, United Steelworkers of America, Afl-Cio-ClcCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Local 15, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Exelon Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Bartlit Beck LLP v. OkadaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021