Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gem State Mutual Life Ass'n v. O'Connell

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 12, 1958No. 8588Published

1Dissent

McQUADE, Justice,

with whom

PORTER, Justice, concurs (dissenting).

Pursuant to Title 41, Chapter 31, Section 17, Idaho Code, the respondent, an Idaho corporation, made application to the commissioner of insurance, appellant herein, for approval of the insurance form entitled "$500.00 Funeral Benefit.” After a hearing and an examination of the policy, the commissioner of insurance denied the application, from which order the respondents appealed to the district court, as provided by statute, and secured a reversal of the commissioner’s ruling on the record taken by the commissioner. From the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. La Tourette v. McMasterSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Bankers' Union of the World v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  3. National Union v. KeefeIllinois Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Carson v. Vicksburg BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1897
  5. Intermountain Lloyds v. DiefendorfIdaho Supreme Court · 1931

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API