Legal Opinion

DANA HINZMAN; MICHELLE HINZMAN v. FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY OF GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided September 8, 2026No. 6:22-cv-01798Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION DANA HINZMAN; MICHELLE Civ. No. 6:22-cv-01798-AA HINZMAN, Plaintiffs, OPINION & ORDER v. FOREMOST INSURANCE COMPANY OF GRAND RAPIDS, MICHIGAN, Defendant. _______________________________________ AIKEN, District Judge. This case comes before the Court on Defendant Foremost Insurance Company of Grand Rapids, Michigan’s Motion for Summary Judgment, ECF No. 56. The Court granted Defendant leave to file supplemental briefing on the issue of the subsequent complete loss and replacement of the Property, with briefs “not to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  5. In Re Oracle Corp. Securities LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API