Legal Opinion

Arnold v. Dodson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 10, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,309PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John D. Turnbaugh, Judge, presiding. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely

This is an appeal from á judgment obtained by Mary M. Arnold, hereinafter called plaintiff, against William E. Dodson, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago.

The plaintiff’s statement of claim alleges that on the , sixth day of November, 1911, she purchased from the \ defendant fifty shares of the capital stock of the National Machine Recorder Company (hereinafter referred -to as the Recorder Company) for the sum of $3,150; that she was induced to make such purchase because the defendant falsely represented to hers that the machines manufactured by the Recorder Company were beyond the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DunleavyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Allen v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Chudnovski v. EckelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Flannery v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Harty Bros. & Harty Co. v. PolakowIllinois Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Burgiel v. AniolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
  2. Fine v. UnschuldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API