Arnold v. Dodson
Appellate Court of Illinois
Appeal from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. John D. Turnbaugh, Judge, presiding. Certiorari denied by Supreme Court (making opinion final).
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McSurely
This is an appeal from á judgment obtained by Mary M. Arnold, hereinafter called plaintiff, against William E. Dodson, defendant, in the Municipal Court of Chicago.
The plaintiff’s statement of claim alleges that on the , sixth day of November, 1911, she purchased from the \ defendant fifty shares of the capital stock of the National Machine Recorder Company (hereinafter referred -to as the Recorder Company) for the sum of $3,150; that she was induced to make such purchase because the defendant falsely represented to hers that the machines manufactured by the Recorder Company were beyond the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DunleavyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Allen v. HartIllinois Supreme Court · 1874
- Chudnovski v. EckelsIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Flannery v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1906
- Harty Bros. & Harty Co. v. PolakowIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Burgiel v. AniolAppellate Court of Illinois · 1920
- Fine v. UnschuldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1944