Legal Opinion · Dissent

Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Veneman

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 21, 2006No. 04-15788Published

1DissentKozinski, Circuit Judge

In holding that we can review withdrawal of proposed regulations an agency had no duty to adopt, my colleagues overlook the sea-change in administrative law wrought by Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821, 831-32, 105 S.Ct. 1649, 84 L.Ed.2d 714 (1985), which held that we have no authority to review an agency’s discretionary decision not to act. See The Supreme Court — Leading Cases: Judicial Review of Agency Inaction, 99 Harv. L.Rev. 264, 269 (1985) (hereafter “Judicial Review of Agency Inaction ”) (“Chaney represents a significant departure from the trend of recent administrative law.”). Failure…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API