Legal Opinion

Santa Barbara v. Pasquale Avallone & Stefano Miele, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1936PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, J.

The question presented is whether the defendant-appellant Miele must account for three bonds and a savings bank book and the proceeds thereof which were delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant Pasquale Avallone & Stefano Miele, Inc., to collect in Italy and to redeposit to the credit of the plaintiffs in a savings bank in Rome. The defendant-appellant was an officer of this corporation but had no actual knowledge of the transaction in question.

At Special Term judgment was given for the defendant-appellant and the appeal to the Appellate Division, which reversed, was taken by way of a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Casey v. . KastelNew York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Matter of International M. Co. (Broderick)New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Barbara v. Pasquale Avallone & Stefano Miele, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Reagan & GeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  2. Refrigeration Discount Corp. v. CatinoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1953
  3. Armour & Co. v. CelicCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
  4. Jasel Building Products Corp. v. Polidoro (In Re Polidoro)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  5. People v. RosanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API