Suddard v. American Motor Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts
In Equity.
1Opinion of the Court
LOWEEE, Circuit Judge.
This was a bill in equity to restrain the infringement of a patent. Several claims were in suit, of which one was found to be valid and infringed. An injunction was issued restraining further infringement, and the question here presented concerns only the costs in the case. The defendant contends that the allowance of costs 'to the complainant is forbidden by Rev. St. § 4922 (U. S. Comp. St. 1901^ p. 3396), which reads as follows:
“Whenever, through inadvertence, accident, or mistake, and without any willful default or intent to defraud or mislead the public, a patentee…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- O'Reilly v. MorseSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Smith v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Sessions v. RomadkaSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Gage v. HerringSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Railroad Co. v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Otis Elevator Co. v. Pacific Finance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
- General Motors Corp. v. Leer Auto Supply Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1932
- Bryant Electric Co. v. MarshallU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1909
- John W. Gottschalk Mfg. Co. v. Springfield Wire & Tinsel Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1935