Legal Opinion

Amelina Archelus v. Sunrise Senior Living of Decatur

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided September 1, 2026No. 2:25-cv-00767Unknown

1Opinion

UWS. PISTRIET SuuRY DISTRI? oF VERMONT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FORE FOR THE 2% SEP DISTRICT OF VERMONT PM U4 CLERK ' AMELINA ARCHELUS, ) sy _ un Plaintiff, ) DEFY CER ) . ) v. ) No. 2:25-cv-00767-mk] ) SUNRISE SENIOR LIVING OF ) DECATUR, ) Defendant. ENTRY ORDER DISMISSING AMENDED COMPLAINT (Doc. 7) Plaintiff Amelina Archelus, a Vermont resident representing herself, seeks to bring an action against Sunrise Senior Living of Decatur concerning the suspension of her workers’ compensation benefits. (Doc. 7 at 1-2.) Plaintiffs original Complaint was reviewed under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API