Legal Opinion

United States v. Vardaro

District Court, D. Montana

Decided September 5, 2008No. Cause CR-08-04-BLG-RFCPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

RICHARD F. CEBULL, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Defendant Jesse Lee Vardaro is charged by Indictment with Failure to Register as a Sex Offender, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2250(a). Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the Indictment, asserting three grounds for dismissal: (1) Congress exceeded its powers under the Commerce Clause in enacting SORNA’s registration requirements and making it a federal crime to fail to register; (2) Defendant’s conviction would violate due process of law because Defendant was not notified of his obligation to register under SORNA; and (3) SORNA violates…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. EnsmingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. United States v. BeneventoDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  3. United States v. HardemanDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
  4. United States v. DeanDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2009
  5. United States v. EnsmingerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API