Legal Opinion
Daniels v. Cincinnati Insurance
District Court, S.D. Indiana
Decided February 3, 1993No. IP 91-191-CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*258ENTRY
BARKER, District Judge.
On September 4, 1992, this Court denied the Cincinnati Insurance Company’s motion for summary judgment, and sua sponte granted William E. Daniels summary judgment and issued a corresponding Judgment on Daniels’ request for declaratory relief, 800 F.Supp. 753. The Cincinnati Insurance Company has since filed a Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment, asserting that by addressing' and deciding issues other than the one raised in its motion (regarding the import of “exclusion (h)” under Daniels’ insurance policy), it was denied due process and the opportunity to present and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bernard Beam v. Ipco Corporation, D/B/A Sterling OpticalCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- In the Matter of Ulyssus George Wade, Joyce Wade, and U.G. Wade Trucking, Inc., Debtors-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Richard D. Price, Jr., Formerly Doing Business as Richard D. Price, Jr. & Associates, Limited v. James M. Rochford, Kirk A. Holman, Jack C. VieleyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- Milwaukee Typographical Union No. 23 v. Newspapers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ala. Plating v. US Fidelity and Guar.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997