Legal Opinion

Lindbloom v. Teton International

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 2, 1984No. 83-247PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROONEY, Chief Justice.

Appellant-employee, Steve Lindbloom, was denied benefits by the district court under the Wyoming Worker’s Compensation Act for medical and hospital expenses, as well as temporary total disability for injury suffered to his right leg while in the course of employment with appellee, Teton International.

We affirm the district court’s ruling.

The injury occurred on April 6, 1983. Appellant was carrying a box of tools to a rental unit he was to service when he slipped on some ice and his right knee popped out of its socket.

Appellant had suffered a similar dislocation of his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Madden's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  2. Jim's Water Service v. EayrsWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Tanenbaum v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Associated Seed Growers, Inc. v. ScroghamWyoming Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Olson v. Federal American PartnersWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Kenyon v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Romero v. Davy McKee Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Middlemass v. State Ex Rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Boyce v. State ex rel. Wyoming Workers' Safety & Compensation DivisionWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Brees v. Gulley Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API