Legal Opinion · Dissent

State of Alaska v. Bruce Babbitt, Secretary of the Interior, Katie John v. United States of America

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1995No. 94-35480, 94-35481Published

1DissentCynthia Holcomb Hall, Circuit Judge

I

The issue in this case should be a simple one to resolve: Is the fish camp located in navigable waters at the confluence of the Tanaga Creek and Copper River, in the midst of the Wrangell-St. Elias National Park, “public land” for the purposes of the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act (ANILCA), 16 U.S.C. §§ 3101, et seq.? It is, unfortunately, an incredibly complex issue1 whose resolution will impact all the navigable waters in Alaska. Because I feel that we, as judges, are not empowered to resolve this issue without direction from Cqn-gress, I dissent.

I agree with the majority…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. United States v. LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  3. Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Wickard v. FilburnSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  5. Kaiser Aetna v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API