Legal Opinion
Heitman v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided March 14, 1990No. 05-88-01185-CRPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WHITTINGTON, Justice.
William Randolph Heitman appeals from a conviction for unlawful possession of methamphetamine 1 and from a conviction for unlawful possession of cocaine. 2 Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, the judge assessed punishment in each case at five years’ confinement and a $1,500 fine. In his sole point of error, appellant contends that the trial court erred in denying his pretrial motions to suppress evidence. We affirm.
FACTS
In October of 1988, Roy Gregory Hansen 3 was confined in the Collin County Jail with four charges pending against him when the police first…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Blake v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
- McKissick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2006
- Morris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2001
- Darby v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
- Alex Rene Gonzales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2015
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.