Legal Opinion
Coene v. 3M Co.
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided September 11, 2014No. 10-CV-6546GPublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION & ORDER
MARIAN W. PAYSON, United States Magistrate Judge.
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
Plaintiffs Robert Coene (“Coene”) and Valerie Coene have sued defendant 3M Company (“3M”) asserting a variety of state law claims sounding in products liability, breach of warranty, negligence and fraud arising out of Coene’s alleged occupational exposure to silica dust during his employment. (Docket # 1). According to Coene, 3M designed and manufactured respirators, which it distributed and sold to Coene’s employer, Eastman Kodak Company (“Kodak”). (Id. at ¶ 19). Coene contends that he used 3M respirators…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Kassner v. 2nd Avenue Delicatessen Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Nimely v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Engler v. MTD Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2015
- Paulus v. Holimont, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- Butler v. Suffolk CountyDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2025
- Colon v. MSMC Residential Realty LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2021
- Drake v. Old DominionDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2024
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.