Legal Opinion
Thirteenth Guam Legislature v. Bordallo
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 8, 1978No. 77-2794PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
588 F.2d 265
THIRTEENTH GUAM LEGISLATURE, Thomas V. C. Tanaka, Donald J.
Hook and Vicente P. Castro, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
Ricardo J. BORDALLO, the Governor of Guam, Frank G. Blaz,
Director of Administration, and Maria C. Duenas,
the Treasurer of Guam, Defendants-Appellants.
No. 77-2794.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Nov. 8, 1978.
Charles H. Troutman, Atty. Gen. of Government of Guam, Agana, Guam, Philip H. Jacobsen, Acting Atty. Gen. (argued), of Government of Guam, Agana, Guam, for defendants-appellants.
Brooks & Klitzkie, Agana, Guam, J. Bradley Klemm (argued), of Klemm, Dear &…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sosna v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Nebraska Press Assn. v. StuartSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Weinstein v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Thirteenth Guam Legislature v. BordalloDistrict Court, D. Guam · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sample v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985