Pratt, Read & Co. v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Per curiam
The motion for reargument is based upon the proposition- that General Statutes, § 3660, contemplates that the Public Utilities Commission may make not merely an affirmative order requiring gates, flagmen, etc., but a negative order prohibiting either.
We did not and cannot now construe this statute as giving the Commission power to make a negative order of this character. We did not overlook the distinction the defendant attempts to draw between General Statutes, §§ 3660 and 3661, and §§ 3792-3796. We do not think it exists, but that the principle announced in the decision is equally…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Dyson v. New York & New England RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kinderavich v. PalmerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Schumacher v. MillerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930