Trout v. State
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN N. LIMBAUGH, JR., Judge.
This case involves procedural challenges to the validity of H.B. 1900 — the so-called campaign finance reform bill enacted in *1432006 — on the basis of alleged violations of the clear title, single subject and original purpose requirements of article III, sections 21 and 23 of the Missouri Constitution. The trial court invalidated two statutes within the bill, section 115.342, RSMo Supp.2006, (disqualifying persons who are delinquent on certain taxes from running for office) and section 115.350, RSMo Supp.2006, (disqualifying felons from running for office),…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Reynolds v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Norton v. Shelby CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- State Ex Rel. Cardinal Glennon Memorial Hospital for Children v. GaertnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SalterSupreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- Roach v. StoufferCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
- Rentschler v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2010
- State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
- State Ex Inf. Hensley v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.