Legal Opinion

State v. Salter

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided April 15, 2008No. SC 88274PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARY R. RUSSELL, Judge.

Robert Salter (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction for failure to insure workers’ compensation liability under section 287.128.5, RSMo 2000, 1 which he contends is unconstitutional. Because this action involves the validity of a state statute, this Court has exclusive jurisdiction over this appeal. Mo. Const, art. V, sec. 3. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

I. Facts

Defendant, president of Housecalls, Inc. (“Corporation”), was charged with the class D felony of failure to insure workers’ compensation liability under section 287.128.5. 2 Corporation had…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 2006
  3. State v. MiddletonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1999
  4. State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  5. State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. State v. Celis-GarciaSupreme Court of Missouri · 2011
  3. State v. McFaddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  4. State v. TisiusSupreme Court of Missouri · 2012
  5. State of Missouri v. Jesse DriskillSupreme Court of Missouri · 2015

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API