Legal Opinion

State v. Archer

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 15, 1997No. 95NB1538; CA A93104Published

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, J.

Defendant is charged with the offense of driving while under the influence of intoxicants. ORS 813.010. Before trial, he moved in limine to exclude evidence about his prior conviction for driving while suspended (DWS). The trial court granted his motion, and the state appeals. ORS 138.060(3). We reverse.

The court’s order provides:

“ mt is
“HEREBY ORDERED THAT defendant’s motion in limine is granted. The Court holds that if the defendant is asked by his attorney if he has ever been convicted of a crime and if he admits to a conviction for Driving While Suspended, or if his attorney asks him if…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State v. PrattOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. DickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  4. State v. VenegasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API