Legal Opinion

Saad v. Colonial Penn Insurance

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided July 27, 1993No. 11231PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, Colonial Penn Insurance Company (Colonial), from the granting by the trial court of a motion to compel arbitration and an order prohibiting discovery proceedings. The sole issue is whether, in light of the plaintiffs agreement to submit to the examination under oath, this appeal is now moot. We hold that it is moot.

After sustaining injuries in an automobile accident on June 3, 1989, the plaintiff, Keith Saad, submitted a claim for underinsured motorist benefits under a policy of insurance issued by Colonial. Colonial submitted interrogatories to Saad on…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Oliva v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  2. Fromer v. Tree WardenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. Mocarski v. United Services Automobile Ass'nConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Arute Bros. v. Department of TransportationConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  2. Hine Builders, LLC v. GlasscockConnecticut Appellate Court · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API