Petrauskas v. Kipnis
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Per curiam
(First District, Third Division):
Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 364, a rule was entered against plaintiff-appellant to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed for failure to file a cost bond. Appellant responded in timely fashion. The question before this court is whether the insolvent appellant has shown sufficient cause why this appeal should not be dismissed.
Appeal dismissed.
The pleadings before this court and the common law record below indicate the following. Petronele Petrauskas was seriously injured in an automobile accident in 1960. She brought suit in the circuit court of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Jack Spring, Inc. v. LittleIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
- Lowe v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Chicago & Iowa Railroad v. LaneIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
- Petrauskas v. MotejunasAppellate Court of Illinois · 1971
- Roberts v. FahsIllinois Supreme Court · 1863
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Diamond Mortgage Corp. v. ArmstrongAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
- Lyons Bros. Lumber & Fuel Co. v. ShepherdAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
- Central National Bank v. BaimeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- Hall v. TurneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977