Autry v. Autry

OPINION

J. CURTISS BROWN, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from the trial court’s granting of appellee’s motion to modify for increased child support. In one point of error, appellant asserts that the trial court erred by granting appellee’s motion because the court lacked jurisdiction. We affirm.

On February 19, 1991, the appellee filed a motion to modify seeking increased child support. Upon appellant’s filing a general denial, the case was set on the trial court’s contested docket. On several occasions the case was reset because of scheduling conflicts for appellant’s attorney. To accelerate…