Legal Opinion

People v. Todaro

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1931No. Docket Nos. 160, 161, Calendar Nos. 35,047, 35,048PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

Defendants were informed against, tried jointly with other defendants, convicted of robbery armed, and bring error.

October 27, 1929, at 3848 High Street, Ecorse, a house of prostitution and cabaret was in operation and many of its inmates and patrons present. At about 1:45 a. m., at an apparently concerted signal, the inmates and patrons were held up and robbed. The police were called, five officers responded, several arrests were made, and a part of the spoils of the robbery recovered. Defendants were present at the time of the robbery. De Piazzi claims he was there as a patron, did not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. MeadMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Merkle v. Township of BenningtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  3. People v. LintzMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Herrick v. WixomMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. CourtneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. People v. BoboMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  2. People v. BiggeMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  3. People v. KelseyMichigan Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People v. BurnsteinMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  5. People v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1932

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API