Legal Opinion

Silverio v. Sweetman

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 7, 1972PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury in the Superior Court awarded the plaintiff $2,500 as compensation for the injuries he sustained when he was struck by an automobile operated by the defendant. Not satisfied with that award, the plaintiff asked for an “additur and/or a new trial.” His motion was granted and a new trial on the question of damages only was ordered unless the defendant consented to. an additur in the amount of $5,000. The defendant refused to consent and appealed.

In pressing his appeal defendant does not contend that the amount of the additur was excessive or unreasonable, and that, therefore, we should…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Webbier v. Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Handy v. GearySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Fitzgerald v. RendeneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  4. Ruggieri v. Ventalume Window & Door Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971
  5. DiBattista v. LincolnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamrick v. Yellow Cab Company of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  2. Bradley v. Gilchrist, 98-3355 (2003)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2003
  3. Maureen Mowry v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2022
  4. Maureen Mowry v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API