Legal Opinion

DiBattista v. Lincoln

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 24, 1972No. 1405-AppealPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

A husband and wife brought this civil action in the Superior Court to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile collision. A jury returned a verdict of $1,023.84 for the husband and of $457.92 for the wife and thereafter the trial justice granted the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial solely on the question of damages unless the defendant consented to an additur of $1,000 as to each claimant. The defendant refused to file the required consents to the additurs and appealed.

The duties of a trial justice considering a motion for a new trial on the ground of inadequacy of damages are well…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Webbier v. Thoroughbred Racing Protective Bureau, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  2. Handy v. GearySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1969
  3. Fitzgerald v. RendeneSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1964
  4. Ruggieri v. Ventalume Window & Door Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1971

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Kelaghan v. RobertsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1981
  2. Hamrick v. Yellow Cab Company of ProvidenceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1973
  3. Pimental v. D'ALLAIRESupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
  4. Pimental v. PostoianSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1978
  5. Grenier v. Royal Cab, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API