Legal Opinion
Willard v. Higdon
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided June 24, 1914PublishedCited by 6 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBoyd, C. J.
The appellee rented a farm from David H. Roelkey from April 1st, 1910, to April 1st), 1911, by an agreement in writing which contained various provisions — amongst others that Mr. Roelkey ivas to have one-half of all the wheat, corn, oats, clover seed, timothy seed, rye and hay raised on the farm, which the appellee agreed to deliver to any point within five miles therefrom free of cost to Mr. Roelkey. On December 27th, 1910, Mr. Roelkey agreed to sell the farm to the appellants. At that time the following note was given to him:
“Knoxville, Md., Dec. 27, 1910.
“Ninety days after date we jointly…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Heavilon v. HeavilonIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Harvey v. MillionIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Purner v. PiercyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Smith v. BryanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
- Crane v. GoughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1853
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Western Maryland Dairy, Inc. v. Maryland Wrecking & Equipment Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1924
- Washington Suburban Sanitary Commission v. NashCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
- Poole Engineering & MacHine Co. v. SwindellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1932
- Stem v. CrawfordCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1919
- Holmstrom v. BarstadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.