(PC) Keck v. Batra
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BILL KECK, Case No. 1:19-cv-00910-AWI-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 13 v. FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM1 14 S. BATRA, FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD 15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 14) 16 17 Before the Court is Plaintiff Bill Keck’s (“Plaintiff” or “Keck”) First Amended Complaint 18 subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. No. 14, “FAC”). The undersigned 19 recommends the district court dismiss the FAC because it fails to state a plausible…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Denton v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.