Legal Opinion

Davis v. Georgopoulos, 08 Ma 85 (12-2-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 2, 2008No. 08 MA 85PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant Albert Davis appeals from a jury verdict entered in the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court in favor of defendants-appellees George Georgopoulos, M.D. and his medical practice. The sole argument on appeal is that a portion of a jury interrogatory, which the jury never reached, was akin to the special verdict prohibited by Civ. R. 49(C). Due to the failure to establish preservation of the alleged error by objection in the trial court, we find waiver of any issues surrounding the interrogatory. For the reasons expressed below, the judgment of the trial court is…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goldfuss v. DavidsonOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Ramage v. Central Ohio Emergency Services, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Nakoff v. Fairview General HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. LeFort v. Century 21-Maitland Realty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gable v. Village of Gates MillsOhio Supreme Court · 2004

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wittenbrook v. Elecs. Recycling Servs., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API