Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Cox v. Doe 1

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided September 27, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00319Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION BRADLEY M. COX, Plaintiff, v. CAUSE NO. 3:23-CV-319-JD-MGG JOHN DOE #1, JASON STEWART, and JOSEPH GASS, Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER Bradley M. Cox, a prisoner without a lawyer, filed a complaint, asserting a Fourth Amendment clam for an illegal search under Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents,

403 U.S. 388, 91

(1971). ECF 1. “A document filed pro se is to be liberally construed, and a pro se complaint, however inartfully pleaded, must be held to less stringent standards than formal pleadings drafted by lawyers.”…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Mhammad Abu-Shawish v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Jackson v. KotterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API