Legal Opinion
In Re Cecil
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided April 3, 1987No. 19-60087PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ROSS W. KRUMM, Bankruptcy Judge.
Facts
This matter comes on upon the Motion to Dismiss the Chapter 7 proceeding of Richard Bartlett Cecil, Jr. and Cheryl Theresa Shaw Cecil (hereinafter referred to as “the Cecils”) filed by Richard R. Markley and Suzanne M. Markley (hereinafter referred to as “the Markleys”). As grounds for dismissal, the Markleys assert 11 U.S.C. § 707(a) and § 707(b).
The allegations in the Motion to Dismiss state that the granting of relief to the Cecils in Chapter 7 would be a “substantial abuse” of the provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. The Markleys’…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re HudsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
- In Re MartinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983
- In Re HeatleyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
- In Re GarrowUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Vermont · 1985
3Cited by13 opinions
- Sinkow v. Latimer (In Re Latimer)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- In Re KhanUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- In Re KenistonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Hampshire · 1988
- McDow v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
- In Re GriffiethUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.