Legal Opinion

Molloy v. City of Chattanooga

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1950PublishedCited by 18 opinions

(May Session, 1950.)

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Tomlinson

Becaase of the very serioas economic depression existing in 1932 and continaing for several years the City of Chattanooga was anable to collect enoagh taxes to meet its badget appropriations. So it became necessary to redace the salaries of all of its officials and employees. This was done by formal action as to all employees and officials except those in the police and fire departments. The City had no aathority to redace their compensation below $160.00 per month becaase that minimum was fixed by Chapter 692 of the Private Acts of 1927. However, the Commissioner of these two departments did…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jennings v. JenningsTennessee Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Saylor v. TrotterTennessee Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Johnson v. FordTennessee Supreme Court · 1922
  4. State Ex Rel. Ball v. City of KnoxvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Steele v. City of ChattanoogaCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1935

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Provident Washington Insurance Company v. ReeseTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Shannon Ex Rel. Shannon v. Board of EducationTennessee Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Continental Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1977
  4. Fisher v. GE Medical SystemsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2003
  5. Guy M. Beaty, Sr., and Cross-Appellants v. Brock & Blevins Company, Inc., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API