Legal Opinion

Bodenheimer v. Freitag

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided January 6, 1995No. 94-C-2573PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

651 So.2d 251 (1995)

Gregory L. BODENHEIMER

v.

Diane FREITAG.

No. 94-C-2573.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

January 6, 1995.

PER CURIAM.[*]

Granted. The judgments of both lower courts are vacated and the case is remanded to the district court for further consideration and disposition in accordance with this summary per curiam opinion.

Diane Freitag ("Freitag") is not entitled to rent from her former husband, Gregory L. Bodenheimer ("Bodenheimer"). See La.Rev.Stat.Ann. § 9:374(C) (West 1991); Barr v. Barr, 613 So.2d 1159 (La.Ct.App. 5th Cir.1993); Burrell v. Burrell, 518 So.2d 569 (La.Ct.App. 4th…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sims v. SimsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1978
  2. Hare v. HodginsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1991

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McCarroll v. McCarrollSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1997
  2. Fulco v. FulcoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
  3. Ecroyd v. EcroydLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1996
  4. Bodenheimer v. FreitagLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  5. Bulloch v. BullochLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API