Legal Opinion

Heaton v. Leonard

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1893PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from special term, Clinton county. Action by Rufus Heaton against Theodore M. Leonard. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtPutnam, J.

This action was brought in justice’s court on an alleged account amounting to $29.14. The defense asserted by defendant was a general denial, and the statute of limitations. During the trial plaintiff withdrew one item of $5. The account accrued over six years before the commencement of the action, but within six years defendant offered plaintiff a check for $24.14, signed by him, in settlement of the claim; and, although plaintiff refused to receive it, he claims it was a sufficient acknowledgment in writing to take the case out of the statute of limitations. The testimony in the case was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manchester v. . BraednerNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Sands v. GelstonNew York Supreme Court · 1818
  3. Bloodgood v. . BruenNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Creuse v. DefiganiereThe Superior Court of New York City · 1863

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. John W. Masury & Son v. Bisbee Lumber Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Nagle v. HeroldDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API