Bloodgood v. . Bruen
New York Court of Appeals
This was an appeal from a decree of the superior court of the city of New York. On the 28th day of June, 1828, Thomas H. Smith and George W. Bruen were partners in business in the city of New York, under the style of Thomas H. Smith & Son. .Upon that day the firm became indebted, to Thomas Blood-good, the plaintiff’s testator, in the sum of $10,360T1 upon a promissory note, payable in ninety days from date.
Read the full summary
This was an appeal from a decree of the superior court of the city of New York. On the 28th day of June, 1828, Thomas H. Smith and George W. Bruen were partners in business in the city of New York, under the style of Thomas H. Smith & Son. .Upon that day the firm became indebted, to Thomas Blood-good, the plaintiff’s testator, in the sum of $10,360T1 upon a promissory note, payable in ninety days from date. Thomas H. Smith died in September, 1828, leaving a large estate consisting of real and personal property, which he disposed of by will. In this will the first provision was as follows:. “…
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The bill was filed August 16, 1845, to establish a debt against the estate of Thos. H. Smith, deceased.
The cause of action was a promissory note, made to the plaintiff's testator, by Thos. H. Smith, the deceased, and George W. Bruen in the name of the firm of T.S. Smith Son, dated the 21st June, 1828, for $10,000 and upwards,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bell v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- Thompson v. PeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
- Van Hook v. WhitlockNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
3Cited by41 opinions
- Butler v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- Schutz v. . MoretteNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- In Re PovillCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- Bucklin v. ChapinNew York Supreme Court · 1868
- In Re the Judicial Settlement of the Accounts of KendrickNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.