Legal Opinion

Minturn ex rel. Minturn v. Proctor & Gamble Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 6, 1918No. 21,479PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Wyandotte district court,' division No. 1; Edward L. Fischer, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*886The opinion of the court was delivered by

West, J.:

A minor, by his next friend, brought this action to recover under the workmen’s compensation act for an injury to his hand, received while working in the defendant’s plant. A demurrer to his evidence was overruled, and a recovery was had. The defendant appeals, ■ and contends that the plaintiff cannot prevail because the three months’ claim for compensation provided by the statute was not given, six months having elapsed before the defendant was notified.

Section 22 of the original act, as amended by the act of 1913, (Gen. Stat. 1915, § 5916)…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lacholia v. Texas Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Latcholia v. Texas Employers Ins. Ass'nTexas Commission of Appeals · 1942
  3. Baxter v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Brenn v. City of St. JohnSupreme Court of Kansas · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API