Hartman v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by:
TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.
Does a trial court abuse its discretion by admitting an expert’s testimony, relating the results of a blood-alcohol test back *491from the time it was taken to the time a defendant was driving, when the expert acknowledges he does not know the defendant’s weight or his eating or drinking history on the occasion in question? We answer in the negative.
Allen Spock Hartman was convicted by a jury of being intoxicated while driving or operating a motor vehicle in a public place. See Tex. PeN.Code Ann. § 49.04 (Vernon 1994). Punishment was assessed at ninety days…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hartman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Forte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1986
- Ochoa v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1999
- Hartman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1996
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bagheri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
- Mata v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Bagheri v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
- Commonwealth v. SeniorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Mata v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.