Legal Opinion
Mohave County v. City of Kingman
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided May 9, 1989No. CV-88-0203-PRPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAMERON, Justice.
I. JURISDICTION
We granted Mohave County’s petition for review of a court of appeals’ opinion holding that Mohave County was not liable for the costs of housing prisoners arrested, charged or convicted of violating a city ordinance, but was liable for the cost of housing prisoners charged or convicted of violating a state statute. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const, art. 6, § 5(3), A.R.S. § 12-120.24 and Ariz.R.Civ.App.P. 23, 17B A.R.S.
II. ISSUES
A. Are counties responsible for the cost of housing prisoners arrested by a city officer and charged with violating a city…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Phoenix v. Super. Ct., Maricopa Cty.Arizona Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Phoenix v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Lemons v. Superior Court of Gila CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- Cottonwood Development v. Foothills Area Coalition of Tucson, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Dupnik v. MacDougallArizona Supreme Court · 1983
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Woodbury County v. City of Sioux CitySupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- HOSPITAL COMMITTEE FOR LIVERMORE-PLEASANTON AREAS v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- University Medical Center, Corp. v. Pima CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2009